Her communication skills put both the subject as well as the interviewer at ease thus facilitating an unbiased and effective data collection. She was also able to collect the CASQ data of more than 50% of the students a year later. ![]() She trained the team on all aspects of NEO-Five Factor Inventory (FFI) as well as CASQ. This study examined the psychometric properties of the Children's Attributional Style Questionnaire (CASQ), the 48-item questionnaire designed to assess children's causal explanations for positive and negative eventsĭuring that project, Pema demonstrated the ability to work independently with creativity and enthusiasm as well as effectively lead a team of 3 Project Fellows for sample selection and data collection techniques. After a long secondary research, we decided on evaluating our subjects on NEO-Five Factor Inventory (FFI) before the actual experiment. She often discussed her findings with me as well as discuss the course of action and possible evaluation techniques for the project. On appointment, I often found her in the library looking for other similar studies done. I was impressed by her preparedness for the interview and her inquisitiveness to know more on the subject. She had asked good questions and also referred a few Learned Helplessness studies that have been carried out by the students in the Department as their Masters and M. We had discussed the scope of the project and her job responsibilities in our first meeting. She first approached me two years ago about the possibility of work in my project as a Research Fellow. Pema has completed her Masters and MPhil in Adolescent Psychology from. Tenzin for the past two years through her work in my Project titled, ‘Learned Helplessness and Achievements in Adolescent Males and Females’. It is a pleasure to recommend Ms Tenzin Pema for a PhD programme in Psychiatry at. No quality should be mentioned without a suitable example.įinally, the concluding paragraph would be summing up the above with a line recommending the applicant to the programme.Įlements of Letter of Recommendation for PhDĪbout the reviewer association with the applicant. The next 3–4 paragraphs should outline the different academic and social qualities of the applicant with suitable substantiation. ![]() The LOR should begin with an introductory paragraph about the recommender and his/her association with the applicant. The document should be well differentiated into 5–6 paragraphs. Letter of Recommendation for PhD Students: Parts of an LORĪ Recommendation Letter for PhD will typically be between one to two pages. Courses and knowledge related to PhD programme related packages, extra courses, statistical analysis techniques should be exemplified in the Letter of Recommendation. Therefore, the applicants should also display perseverance, competitiveness and ability to work independently. Advanced study like PhD is often a challenging and demanding program. Emphasis should be given on passion and dedication as well. ![]() Letters of Recommendation should show the student as possessing positive qualities like intelligence, self-motivation, responsibility, and amicableness. Referees should speak of strong subject knowledge as well as analysis traits. PhD recommendations are very subject specific. Letter of Recommendation for PhD Students: Qualities to focus on View all Online Courses and Certifications.Online Short Term Courses and Certifications. ![]() They should also be aware of your future plans.Īcademic recommendations can be taken from teachers, supervisors, guides, internship/project supervisors etc. The recommender should not only know you as one of the students at the department, they should know you as a person, your capabilities as a student, as well as your control over the subject they have been teaching. Last but not the least, relatives cannot be objective about the applicant's qualities.Īn ideal referee to write Letter of Recommendation for PhD would be a professional who has known the applicant academically for no less than one year. Also, the recommender might not have an in-depth knowledge of the discipline the applicant intends to do a PhD from. Second, as they have not professionally or academically worked with the applicant and their peers, they would not be able to present comparative information of the student. Friends and relatives are not supposed to write your Letter of Recommendation for PhD for a number of reasons First, they do not have the first-hand information of the applicant's academic capabilities.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |